What is a Hammurabi’s, and how does it relate to Scripture?
Peres, your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.” Then Belshazzar gave the command, and Daniel was clothed with purple, a chain of gold was put around his neck, and a proclamation was made about him, that he should be the third ruler in the kingdom. That very night Belshazzar the Chaldean king was killed. And Darius the Mede received the kingdom, being about sixty-two years old.
Key Facts
Term Name
Hammurabi’s
Term Type
Legal System
Purpose
Illustrates divine justice and the consequences of pride, showing earthly power is subject to God's judgment.
Biblical Example
Daniel 5:28-31 (Belshazzar's downfall due to failing to honor God)
Key Takeaways
- Hammurabi’s Code contrasts with biblical covenantal law in ethical foundations.
- Biblical law emphasizes divine mercy over retributive justice seen in Hammurabi’s Code.
- Hammurabi’s legacy highlights God’s sovereign judgment over earthly power.
What is a Hammurabi’s?
Hammurabi’s Code is an ancient Babylonian legal system attributed to King Hammurabi, reflecting early societal norms of justice and governance.
Established around 1754 BCE, the code’s emphasis on retributive justice contrasts with biblical themes of covenantal mercy, as seen in Genesis 15:18, where God promises Abram a divine covenant without reciprocal human conditions.
Hammurabi’s Code and Biblical Law: A Comparative Overview
Hammurabi’s Code, a foundational legal text of ancient Mesopotamia, contrasts sharply with the covenantal framework of biblical law, particularly the Ten Commandments in Exodus 20:1-17.
Hammurabi’s Code, comprising 282 laws inscribed on a stele, emphasized retributive justice through a 'lex talionis' ('eye for an eye') principle, aiming to codify social order under a king’s authority. In contrast, Exodus 20:1-17 presents laws rooted in divine authority, balancing moral imperatives (e.g., 'You shall not murder') with relational obligations (e.g., 'Honor your father and mother'). While Hammurabi’s laws often prescribed proportional penalties for offenses, biblical law integrated ethical commands with promises of blessings for obedience and warnings of curses for disobedience.
The ethical foundation of Hammurabi’s Code prioritized human governance and societal stability, whereas biblical law, as seen in Exodus 20, derives from God’s covenantal relationship with His people. This distinction shapes their application: Hammurabi’s laws operated within a hierarchical, utilitarian framework, while biblical law called for a transformative, mercy-oriented justice that transcended mere legalism.
Hammurabi’s in Biblical Scholarship
Scholars analyze Deuteronomy 5:1-33 as a key text for understanding how biblical covenantal ethics diverge from Hammurabi’s Code.
In Deuteronomy 5:1-33, Moses reiterates the Ten Commandments as part of Israel’s covenant with God, emphasizing divine authority rather than human governance. Unlike Hammurabi’s Code, which codifies retributive justice through a hierarchical legal system, Deuteronomy frames laws as relational obligations rooted in God’s redemptive act at Sinai. The covenantal structure here includes conditional blessings and curses (Deuteronomy 5:29-33), reflecting a reciprocal relationship where obedience is tied to communal well-being rather than mere societal control. This contrast highlights biblical law’s focus on transformative justice and mercy, distinguishing it from the utilitarian principles of Hammurabi’s Code while situating it within broader ancient Near Eastern covenantal traditions.
How to Read Hammurabi’s Correctly
To interpret Hammurabis Code accurately, readers must situate it within its ancient Mesopotamian context while recognizing its distinctiveness from biblical covenantal ethics.
Hammurabis Code, with its retributive eye for an eye principle, reflects a utilitarian approach to justice rooted in human governance, whereas Leviticus 19:18 (You shall love your neighbor as yourself) exemplifies a moral framework centered on divine mercy and relational responsibility. Understanding this distinction prevents conflating ancient legal systems with the transformative ethics of Scripture, which prioritize internal character over external penalties. Biblical law, as seen in Leviticus, calls for a justice that transcends mere retribution.
Contextualizing Hammurabis Code thus requires acknowledging its historical role in shaping early legal thought while affirming that biblical teachings offer a higher standard of justice grounded in Gods redemptive purposes for His people.
Going Deeper
Exploring Hammurabi’s Code alongside biblical law reveals distinct approaches to justice and covenant.
Scholars often compare these legal systems to highlight how Deuteronomy 5:1-33 redefines covenantal obligations beyond retributive measures. Leviticus 19:18, emphasizing love for neighbors, underscores a moral framework that transcends Hammurabi’s utilitarian principles, inviting deeper reflection on divine justice.
Further Reading
Key Scripture Mentions
Daniel 5:28-31
Belshazzar’s kingdom falls due to failing to honor God, illustrating divine judgment.
Exodus 20:1-17
The Ten Commandments establish covenantal law rooted in divine authority.
Leviticus 19:18
Commands to love neighbors as oneself, emphasizing mercy over retribution.
Related Concepts
Covenant (Theological Concepts)
Biblical framework of relational obligations rooted in divine authority.
Lex Talionis (Terms)
Retributive justice principle ('eye for an eye') in Hammurabi’s Code.
Divine Mercy (Theological Concepts)
Biblical emphasis on grace over strict legalism seen in covenantal law.