Terms

The Biblical Definition of Disputational Style


What Does the Bible Say About Disputational Style?

Matthew 22:41-46

Now while the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them a question, saying, "What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" They said to him, "The son of David." He said to them, "How is it then that David, in the Spirit, calls him Lord, saying, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet”’? If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son?” No one was able to answer him a word, nor from that day did anyone dare to ask him any more questions.

Seeking truth through discerning dialogue, where wisdom is revealed in the pursuit of understanding, as guided by the spirit of humility and the heart of faith
Seeking truth through discerning dialogue, where wisdom is revealed in the pursuit of understanding, as guided by the spirit of humility and the heart of faith

Key Facts

Term Name

Disputational Style

Term Type

Rhetorical Method

Purpose

To reveal spiritual truths, correct errors, and advance God's redemptive narrative through dialogue.

Biblical Example

Jesus' exchange with the Pharisees in Matthew 22:41-46

Key Takeaways

What is a Disputational Style?

Disputational style in Scripture is a rhetorical approach that uses questions, challenges, or debates to explore theological or ethical issues.

This method is evident in Jesus’ exchanges with the Pharisees in Matthew 22:15-22, where He navigates complex questions about taxes and divine authority. Similarly, Paul’s reasoned discussions in Acts (e.g., Acts 17:16-34) demonstrate how disputational style engages audiences in defending Christian teachings. These examples set the stage for examining where this style appears more broadly in the Bible.

Examples of Disputational Styles in Scripture

Two pivotal biblical instances of disputational style emerge in Jesus’ dialogue with the Samaritan woman at the well (John 4) and Paul’s philosophical engagement in Athens (Acts 17:16-34).

In John 4, Jesus employs strategic questioning to challenge the woman’s assumptions about worship and identity, gradually guiding her toward recognition of Him as the Messiah. His method balances theological clarity with cultural sensitivity, using her own context to reveal deeper spiritual truths. This exchange exemplifies how disputational style can both test convictions and extend grace.

Acts 17:16-34 records Paul’s reasoned debate with Athenian intellectuals, where he adapts Greco-Roman rhetorical norms to proclaim the resurrection. By referencing their altar to an “unknown god,” he bridges cultural gaps while asserting distinctively Christian claims, illustrating how disputational style navigates ideological tensions.

These examples demonstrate that disputational style in Scripture reveals character, clarifies doctrine, and advances the narrative of God’s redemptive purposes. It serves these functions beyond simply winning arguments, setting the stage for further exploration of its theological implications.

Finding truth not in our own understanding, but in the redemptive purposes of God, revealed through compassionate dialogue and cultural sensitivity.
Finding truth not in our own understanding, but in the redemptive purposes of God, revealed through compassionate dialogue and cultural sensitivity.

The Purpose of Disputational Styles

Scripture employs disputational styles to reveal spiritual truths, challenge complacency, and clarify essential doctrines. These styles serve purposes beyond merely resolving disagreements.

In John 3, Jesus’ dialogue with Nicodemus models truth-seeking through probing questions, guiding the teacher of Israel toward recognition of spiritual rebirth. Similarly, Matthew 23 records Jesus’ sharp rebukes of the Pharisees, using disputational language to expose their hypocrisy and call for authentic righteousness. Paul’s vehement warnings in Galatians 1:6-9 against false gospels demonstrate how this style defends doctrinal purity, urging believers to remain faithful to the apostolic message. These examples show that disputational styles in Scripture serve to test convictions, correct errors, and advance God’s redemptive narrative, preparing readers for deeper theological reflection in subsequent discussions.

Embracing the discomfort of spiritual rebirth, we find freedom in surrendering our understanding to the wisdom of God, as Jesus teaches in John 3, 'unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God'
Embracing the discomfort of spiritual rebirth, we find freedom in surrendering our understanding to the wisdom of God, as Jesus teaches in John 3, 'unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God'

How to Read Disputational Styles Correctly

To read disputational styles correctly, focus on the speaker’s intent, cultural context, and the dialogue’s purpose within God’s redemptive narrative.

First, identify the speaker’s intent: in Matthew 22:15-22, Jesus navigates a Pharisee trap about taxes by distinguishing between Caesar and God, revealing His wisdom without provocation. Second, note cultural dynamics, as in John 4, where Jesus’ questions to the Samaritan woman reflect both cultural sensitivity and theological depth. Third, distinguish polemic from constructive dialogue, as Paul’s sharp warnings in Galatians 1:6-9 defend doctrine while his Athenian address in Acts 17:16-34 adapts to cultural norms.

Do not reduce these exchanges to simple debate tactics. Modern assumptions about argumentation may misread their spiritual aims. Instead, let these dialogues guide you toward understanding how God uses tension to clarify truth, setting the stage for deeper exploration of their theological implications.

Going Deeper

To deepen your understanding of disputational styles in Scripture, consider exploring commentaries on Johannine dialogues (e.g., John 3 - 4) and Pauline epistles (e.g., Galatians 1:6-9; Acts 17:16-34).

These resources illuminate how Jesus and Paul balanced theological rigor with relational grace, challenging listeners while advancing God’s redemptive purposes. Reflect on how such approaches model Christian engagement with truth and conflict, inviting both intellectual honesty and spiritual growth.

Further Reading

Key Scripture Mentions

Matthew 22:41-46

Jesus challenges the Pharisees with a question about the Messiah's authority.

John 4:1-42

Jesus engages the Samaritan woman in a culturally sensitive theological dialogue.

Acts 17:16-34

Paul adapts Greco-Roman rhetoric to proclaim the resurrection in Athens.

Related Concepts

Doctrinal Purity (Theological Concepts)

Paul's sharp warnings in Galatians defend the integrity of apostolic teaching.

Cultural Sensitivity (Terms)

Jesus' engagement with the Samaritan woman demonstrates contextual awareness.

Spiritual Rebirth (Theological Concepts)

Jesus' dialogue with Nicodemus reveals the necessity of new birth.

Glossary